Thew new talent bar for software engineers
Web software engineering is changing rapidly. While this shift is not equally distributed and is often easy to overlook in the day-to-day, it is coming whether you are ready or not.
The reality is that writing software is becoming cheaper and faster at an incredible rate, but the systems we’ve built around that production are lagging. Our expectations of who does what - between the engineer, tech lead, PM, or designer - remain rooted in an older era. Our product development cycles, release processes, customer access protocols, and even interview loops were all battle-tested for a world where building a feature took a month. They are not built for a world where that same feature takes a couple of days.
The Innovator’s Dilemma in engineering
We must embrace this change through the lens of the Innovator’s Dilemma. We see AI startups and frontier labs moving with exceptional speed. If you are an incumbent, you need to disrupt your own delivery model. This is about far more than just giving your team Claude Code; it’s about rethinking the entire system: tools, processes, performance expectations, and roles. Engineers are smart and they don’t stay idle. Currently, we see more code being produced everywhere, but too often that code is channeled into areas most comfortable for software engineers: tech debt, low-priority to-dos, minor refactoring or unambiguous small features. While valuable, that isn’t where the real business impact lies.
It is possible to have incredibly capable models, 6 OpenCode windows open all day, 12 ralph loops running 24/7, make 600 commits and close 400 linear issues a day, and yet ship absolutely nothing of value to anyone. pic.twitter.com/oRG4N1L6i2
— Nate Berkopec (@nateberkopec) January 10, 2026
A useful mental model of you can expand your software as a company gives you three dimensions:
- Horizontal expansion: Moving into new product lines. However, doing that successfully in a way that contributes to the business growth is constrained by your GTM engine and distribution. It’s pretty ambiguous both from product and GTM perspective and no “pure” software engineer could drive anything like this.
- Vertical deepening: Making existing features more powerful. However, this dimension is constrained by your user ability to absorb change and adopt new software. It’s pretty ambiguous from a product perspective and usually only very senior software engineers would autonomously drive changes like this.
- Surface quality improvements: Small fixes, product improvements, performance, COGS and refactors. This area is usually pretty safe, predictable and unambiguous. That’s what most engineers usually focus on.
The first two buckets are today constrained by PM and UX bottleneck. Therefore, most AI-driven acceleration in writing software ends up in the third bucket. The real challenge for leaders is shifting those gains into the first and second ones and it’s very hard to do this without evolving the entire system of product delivery.
The new talent bar
To address this, I am explicitly operationalizing three dimensions of talent within my organization at HubSpot through performance expectations and growth plans. To remain competitive, software engineers need to embrace these three pillars:
1. You need to be a Product Engineer
AI is an extension of your agency in delivering business value. Historically, there has been a “fat-head” distribution of impact, where certain, usually very senior, engineers had outsized influence because they could identify and disambiguate high-value problems.
I think that in the coming year we are going to see massive compression of expected behaviours among software engineering levels. What was once a Staff-level behavior - taking ownership of the “surround system” of PMs and designers - is becoming the baseline for mid-level engineers. What will still be obviously different is the expected level of impact - you would expect significantly more differentiation and value from staff than from mid-level engineer. But if an engineer can ship 50-70% more code today, but the PM and design “surround system” isn’t ready for that velocity, they become the bottleneck.
Software is no longer the bottleneck.
— martin_casado (@martin_casado) January 4, 2026
To bridge this, engineers must become subject matter experts in the products they build. You must understand the customer and the business model. You need to be opinionated, research and develop some bets that you want to explore proactively, be able to ask the right questions and find answers yourself, and even think about and act on things like activation, enablement or support.
Being a Product Engineer is about taking ownership of the surrounding system of the past. You need to become a subject matter expert in products you are developing, understand your customers and how you ultimately make money as a business, and be able to identify, and take ownership of actual business outcomes. Performance will increasingly be measured by business impact rather than output metrics like PR counts.
If you would like to learn more about that, some great posts about this:
- https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/the-product-minded-engineer/
- https://leerob.com/product-engineers
- https://x.com/levie/status/2010055953157357622
2. You need to be fullstack
While specialization will always exist, for example in infrastructure, my bet is that the total number of “siloed” engineers will decline. If your value is tied to your ability to deliver business outcomes, you cannot be limited by the stack; business value rarely stops at the boundary of a frontend or backend change. With AI-assisted coding, there is no longer an excuse to specialize in a single language. You must be an engineer who understands the entire system - from browser behavior to distributed system design. You should still cultivate “T-shaped” depth in one or two areas, but you must feel comfortable navigating the entire stack with AI as your navigator.
A timely read on product engineering: and why the frontend/backend split just doesn’t make much sense any more (at startups, the very least, and at nimble teams and companies) - by @leerob https://t.co/PLWzrei4rJ pic.twitter.com/4014jBUmCI
— Gergely Orosz (@GergelyOrosz) December 31, 2025
3. AI is a key part of the stack
AI used to be the exclusive domain of MLEs. Today, it is being democratized. However, the best products are more than just thin wrappers around an LLM; they are complex systems involving RAG, online/offline evaluations, experimentation pipelines, and context management.
These principles are becoming as fundamental as distributed systems design. Just as a backend expert needs to feel comfortable with the frontend, they must now feel comfortable operating within AI systems. AI is no longer a “plugin”; it is a core component of the modern stack.
It’s not your decision. It’s a market decision.
If you don’t lean in now, you risk waking up one day to find you are no longer competitive. This shift toward high-agency, commercially-minded, fullstack engineers is already the “bread and butter” of startups.
With future advances in AI, engineers with this talent stack will be unstoppable
— Shreyas Doshi (@shreyas) January 16, 2024
-strong eng skills
-good (top 10%) product sense
-decent (top 25%) commercial sense
-high agency
-clear communication
They’re valuable today, but with AI they won’t need large teams nor any PM help
For incumbents, the clock is ticking. You cannot catch up to the speed of a hungry startup just by buying tools. Their advantage comes from the entire system of delivery and the shape of the talent they attract. As an engineer, you must grow into these categories. As a leader, you must operationalize them. The tools are available to everyone — the system is what will set you apart.